ImaJAN Media Network
MeltedJoystick Home
   Games  Members
Search +
Searching... Close  
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
  
 
  Login Using Facebook
Twitter
 
     

Too Expensive/Big to Make/Fail.

View Nelson Schneider's Profile

By Nelson Schneider - 02/04/18 at 03:09 PM CT

The folks at the Extra Credits Youtube channel are at it again. They’ve already established that they know jack-squat about RPGs or difficult games, but now they’re beating the establishment drum that new retail games shouldn’t cost $60 anymore: They should cost MORE.



According to Extra Credits, “supplementary income systems” – that is, game publishers trying to milk more dollars out of their customers post-purchase – are just a thing we’re going to have to live with. Developers have to eat, after all, and bla bla bla, platitude platitude.

The fact that big corporate “AAA” game publishers are constantly looking for new revenue streams has nothing, in fact, to do with the so-called “fact” that games are “too expensive” to make, and everything to do with the fact that the “AAA” publishers we’re talking about are Western, and primarily American, and are thus trapped within the growth-obsessed, bubble-based flavor of Capitalism that has been the driving force behind both Western progress and incredible suffering for hundreds of years.

What was the straw that broke the camel’s back and sparked the American Revolution? Taxes and tea prices. What was the driving force behind the Civil War? Plantation owners didn’t want to give up their free labor force and replace it with a system by which they would have to pay indentured servants a pitiful wage for the same work. What fueled the industrial revolution? The promise of more profit for less investment. What about the outsourcing movement of the '90s and '00s? I think you can pick up the pattern.

Any student of history can look at Western civilization and see a perpetual cycle of progress tied hand-in-hand to systematic exploitation because the wealthy aren’t content to be wealthy: they want to be MORE wealthy. The gigantic corporate heads of the three-fold hellhound of the “AAA” games industry are no different from Roman patricians or powdered-wigged aristocrats. They already have most of the money to be obtained from making videogames, but they want ALL of it, and once they have all of it, they will want to find a way to make more money appear out of thin air because of the misguided idea that lack of growth = stagnation and stagnation = death.

Another Youtube gaming pundit, one Tarmack, who produces the “Feature Creep” video series, has a much more realistic analysis of what’s going on in the “AAA” games industry, which paints a picture of profitable publishers adding “supplementary income systems” not because they are necessary to stave off bankruptcy or mitigate loss, but to push profit margins ever wider in order to placate growth-hungry shareholders and corporate bean counters.



We have a vibrant Indie games cottage industry that produces quality titles that sell for far less than $60. We have a vibrant digital distribution ecosystem that sees regular deep discounts driving expected prices ever lower, while the people who make and sell these games see an incredible long tail of sales that extends well beyond a myopic launch window. Yet the biggest and most profit-flush actors in the industry continually seek new ways to exploit money out of their audience simply because they can. With loot boxes and microtransactions coming under increasing fire and receiving near universal backlash in the tail end of 2017, it’s possible to become overconfident in our ability as gamers to push back against our overlords and get what we want, but that is sadly an illusion.



A leaked document obtained by yet another Youtube gaming pundit, SidAlpha, reveals that the “AAA” games industry isn’t going to take the failure of loot boxes and pseudo-gambling in retail games lying down and are already hard at work integrating machine learning and AI systems into a systematic layer of psychological manipulation that aims to warp our minds so much that we suddenly find ourselves wanting to give them more of our money.

Sadly, it seems that the problem of overweening monetization will never go away. Gaming has become too big and appeals to too many people who simply don’t care and refuse to think about the consequences of their actions. The hoi polloi don’t understand that by paying for a gacha spin or bending over for a paywall – no matter how small and insignificant it may seem – is ultimately subjugating all of us to the same miserable fate in perpetuity. Corporations may think they’re “people,” but they’re far more like base animals whose learned behaviors belie any ethical limitations that might be placed upon an actual person. “AAA” publishers are behaving the way they are because they can and because we the gamers haven’t punished them for their overreach.

Share:    
MeltedJoystick Gaming Blog RSS Feed
Comments
2 comments
Name: 

Avoid spam Captcha: Sign Up + or Log In +   



 
View Nelson Schneider's Profile

Nelson Schneider

Wrote on02/18/18 at 04:25 PM CT

I thought you were a "Small Government" type of person.

Write on Profile +

View Matt's Profile

Matt

Wrote on02/10/18 at 07:29 AM CT

Yes, the hope would be that the Lootbox controversy would halt the advance of such things, however, without intervention, that most likely won’t happen. This is the perfect reason why the government needs to step in to protect the populace, just as they do with laws about gambling. Yet, I our system of lobbyist buying votes from congress gives me little hope.

Write on Profile +

Bloggers

Previous Blog Posts

Archive

All Posts

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

 
Log In
 
For members wanting to use FB to login, click here
remember me
 
 

What Members Are Doing

Comments about...

New Game Reviews

Layers of Fear game review by Chris Kavan
Prey game review by Chris Kavan
Dragon Quest Builders game review by Nelson Schneider
Zero-K game review by Chris Kavan
Call of Juarez: Bound in B... game review by Nelson Schneider
Drakkhen game review by Nelson Schneider
Mega Man 11 game review by dbarry_22
Octopath Traveler game review by dbarry_22

New Game Lists

Backlog by Nelson Schneider
Wish List: Current Gen Games by dbarry_22
Top Game List by Megadrive
My Backlog by Chris Kavan
Top Nintendo (NES) Games by Nick Barry
Favorite Cooperative Multipla... by Jonzor
Top Sandbox Games by Elizabeth
Top Game List by SIngli6

 

 

 

Contact Us Public Relations MeltedJoystick Friends    

Advertise and Business

Contacts Us

Jobs

About us

SiteMap

 

Support Us

FAQ and Help

News and Press

Terms of Use

Privacy

Hitfix.com

Amazon.com

OVGuide.com

   
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
  
Are you sure you want to delete this blog?