|
|
|
This game is so good. I think it should be up for game of the year in 2011 even though it came out 11 years ago! |
04/20/2011
10:40 pm CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, Alex, I just learned that there was an 'enhanced' port AND a sequel to this game released on the PS2.
And here you are, stuck playing the inferior version on an abomination of a console. :( |
04/19/2011
1:06 am CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
|
|
|
|
It really depends... I usually don't buy into the excuse that a game hasn't aged well because it generally it holds games to standards that didn't exist when the game was made. Well sure, hindsight is 20/20.
Often times, people use this to describe graphics, which is (I think) the unfairest of all.
There are scant few games, however, that I would apply this to, and it's usually based off of gameplay decisions that I think could have been made at the time. I haven't play WinBack in a decade, so I'm just guessing. I did pick it up at Gamers like 6 months ago, so maybe I should stick it in. |
04/18/2011
11:18 pm CT
reply +
report spam + |
|
